Feb 16 2010
A Library Begins With a Single Book
And a twenty-first century document collection begins with a single PDF.
Here’s the federal income tax return from the Humane Society of the United States for the year 2008.
Even though 2009 is over, HSUS has until the end of May to file its taxes for last year, and it's customary to request an "automatic" 3-month extension. So this is the most recent return available.
HSUS itself has published a version of this document on its website. We trust it’s an official copy.
Some highlights:
- HSUS has 555 employees, and paid them $37.8 million in 2008. That includes over $2.5 million contributed to employee pension plans. HSUS chief executive Wayne Pacelle made just over $251,000 in salary and benefits.
- HSUS paid out $4.7 million in grants to other organizations and individuals. That represents a 23 percent drop from 2007; about half of this money went to Californians for Humane Farms, which was the political committee behind the “Proposition 2” ballot campaign.
- Although HSUS’s overall income was down by $16 million, this is entirely due to poor performance of its investments. (HSUS earned $11.8 million in investment profits in 2007, but lost over $7 million in 2008.)
- HSUS raised $86.7 million from the public in 2008, spent $99.7 million (an $8 million increase over 2007), and ended the year with $162.2 million in assets. That’s a sweet bottom line, don’t you think?
Here’s the odd part. That $4.7 million in grants in (2) above? Only about $450,000 of it consists of checks that HSUS wrote to organizations doing hands-on sheltering of dogs and cats. We checked, line by line. We're going to post our accounting of this soon, so anyone can correct our math or quibble with our estimation of what counts as a hands-on pet shelter.
Over at CCF, we detailed some of this at the end of December. HSUS also paid “Arizona Lockbox and Fulfillment, Inc.” over $4.2 million in 2008. That’s more than 4 cents of every dollar it spent. What does this company do? It counts HSUS’s donations.
And we're sure it’s a fine, fine company. But don’t you think it’s a little creepy that its initials are A-L-F?
In addition to this document, we're supplementing The HumaneWatch library with HSUS tax returns going back to 1995. Do your filing cabinets contain any earlier HSUS tax documents than these? You know where to send them.
Related Documents
Related Organizations
Posted on 02/16/2010 at 08:15 AM by the HumaneWatch Team
The Best of HumaneWatch • Document Analysis • (11) CommentsComments
“the larger issue why HSUS needs that many people in the first place”.... 555 employees, 50 states, thats 11.1 employees per state. That doesn’t seem exorbitant to me?
So, has anyone asked HSUS to show what they do with the rest of their money each year? Just curious. Does the HSUS have operating expenditures of their own that benefit animals directly or indirectly?
Personally I am gald that I found this article for many reasons. Among the top of that list is my personal feelings towards the HSUS due to my active involvement in the beef industry. Also I am currently writing a paper for one of my college classes exposing the HSUS to the public and to my class for the reason that many people (especially outside of agriculture) do not realize what is really happening with this organization. The fact of the extremely high salaries, along with the outrageous number of employees in one place, is shocking to me. Also I already knew that they didn’t give very much to shelters but I had no idea it was so little…
“$38M/555 employees is an average annual salary of $70K. That’s only a well-paying job if you’re under 30 and have no family obligations and no mortgage.”
My wife and I make less than this combined (both of us are near or in our 30’s, damn old age) and we are doing fine. In this economy $70K per person is more than “a well paying job if you’re under 30” unless you live in one of the top ten cities (DC, NYC, LA, Chicago, etc..). As for the other 85% of the country $70K combined family income can comfortably support a family of 4.
It also needs to be said that this is the average of those employees for that year. I’m sure the top 10% of the company, sorry non-profit organization, received a majority of the money.
This issue with any nonprofit is what percentage of donations actually goes to provide the services they are claiming to offer. There are standards for that. To me it looks like most of their donations go to overhead and only a very small part goes to the real work. That makes this an organization that is largely lining its own pockets, probably through misrepresentation of what they do and a gross misunderstanding by general public about who they are. Given that most of their employees are cluster in the DC area, they are just another big political lobbying group living large on the generosity of Americans.
I don’t understand the confusion. HSUS never claims to be an animal shelter. HSUS is the single most effective voice for animals in the US. That is why I donate monthly.
IS’NT THERE ANYTHING ANYONE OR ANY ANIMAL CAN DO ABOUT THIS?????????????????????
I would Love to know how much money goes for lobbying against eating meat, and the Anti hunting movement.
HSUS care nothing about the animals they say to love, esp. when they don’t give money to help these same animals at the shelters. ESP. when they use that to say they are Saving the wild animals. In many states it is in LAW that hunting and licenses does conservation work. And yet, HSUS is trying to shut hunting down. So, Who is going to take care of the Wild animals when the hunters are gone?
They are a FRAUD that uses the pets and the ads to get rich off of lies.
They seem to rather see these pets die under gas then give money to save them and help them.
PETA is the same way.
This is what I’ve expected from many of these organizations. Where is this money going?? They say they’re doing this for good reasons and then you have questions like this. Just unbelievable.
Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.
Add a comment:
This is meaningless without a comparison to similar nonprofit organizations. Am I supposed to be outraged that Wayne Pacelle makes $250K a year? I could be wrong, but I don’t think that’s at all unusual for the head of a large national charity. Certainly the CEO of a similarly-sized for-profit company would make many times that.
And why are you so offended that the HSUS’s investments lost money in 2008? Are you also offended at every single college and charitable foundation whose endowments lost money? I don’t get it.
$38M/555 employees is an average annual salary of $70K. That’s only a well-paying job if you’re under 30 and have no family obligations and no mortgage. All of the employees could probably earn more at a for-profit company. I am not outraged that they received ~$5,000 each in retirement benefits.