Jul 07 2011
HSUS Scrambles for Credibility
.jpg)
There’s big news in the animal agriculture world today: The Humane Society of the United States (the world’s richest animal rights group) announced an agreement with the United Egg Producers (the nation’s largest egg trade group) to support federal legislation mandating a national shift in how egg-laying hens are housed. Both groups will support a new legal requirement for “enriched” (larger) cages by 2030. Everyone expects Congress to pass the law next year.
Just yesterday the Oregonian reported that HSUS believed an enriched cage “barely improves the quality of life for hens.” Yet today HSUS is endorsing a switch to those very cages. Did HSUS have a change of heart overnight? We doubt it.
From what we can see, the game is far from played-out.
There are a few dynamics at work here:
- HSUS was left on the sidelines of the Oregon and Washington legislatures, both of which passed enriched-cage laws this year over HSUS’s objections. The Oregon Humane Society opposed HSUS and supported enriched cages. And the Oregon Senate Majority Leader even amended his own bill to remove support for “cage-free” systems and embrace enriched cages instead. That’s a stunning rebuke.
- HSUS faced a significant legal challenge to California’s “Proposition 2” law. Unlike its initiatives in OR and WA, which were specifically worded to effectively ban all cage systems, Prop 2’s vague standard required only that hens have enough room to stand up, lie down, and turn around. HSUS says this means “cage-free” only, but at least one egg producer filed a lawsuit based on the belief that enriched cages meet this standard. HSUS could easily have lost the suit, nullifying a major part of Prop 2.
- HSUS was quickly losing credibility as animal welfare advocates embraced enriched cages. The American Humane Association and the renowned Temple Grandin lauded the new furnished cage systems over a year ago. In Europe, enriched cages will become the new gold standard when conventional cages are phased out at the end of the year. And on balance, the American Veterinary Medical Association’s review of the scientific literature shows clear benefits to enriched cages.
Feedstuffs reports: “Talks between the two parties started after HSUS said it recognized that there were benefits to colonies, reversing a position that it only supported cage-free egg production systems.”
It must be truly embarrassing for HSUS—and disheartening to the group’s devoted animal “liberationists” — to have to retreat from a principled (if wacky) position and agree to support confining hens in cages for the foreseeable future.
HSUS will argue from a practical point of view that it’s doing the most good for the most number of hens at the moment, but the result will scramble its credibility in the animal rights movement.
There are also some signs that egg farmers shouldn’t be jumping for joy just yet.
Former PETA vice president Bruce Friedrich announced that his new employer, Farm Sanctuary, supports the enriched-cage legislation on practical grounds, but his group still opposes the actual enriched cages. And, of course, its leaders (like PETA’s and HSUS’s) oppose actually eating eggs of any kind.
We’ve used Friedrich before as a placeholder for HSUS. Even the radical Friedrich (who once said “blowing things up and smashing windows [is] a great way to bring about animal liberation”) is taking the practical approach here: Take an inch, but continue to push for a mile.
As HSUS “Outreach Director” Josh Balk said at the group’s 2009 annual conference, “Anyone who says that cage-free is 100% humane, 100% cruelty-free, just know that’s not accurate.”
We’re sure all of HSUS’s leaders still believe that.
HSUS will be back for egg farmers. Its stated goal is to “get rid of the industry.” But in the meantime, there are plenty of pork, beef, veal, and dairy farmers to hassle.
Posted on 07/07/2011 at 04:53 PM by the HumaneWatch Team
Eggs • Gov't, Lobbying, Politics • (9) CommentsComments
I’m getting the tired of the HSUS. Can’t they find real issues to spend their time and money on? Like… how are we going to provide food for double the world’s population in just a few years? Why do these crazies think animals are equal to people? We want to eat meat, have pets, and raise beef. Leave us alone.
This is great. Both HSUS and UEP gave a lot of ground and made a very reasonable compromise that is in the best interest of large-scale farmers, consumers, and the animals. My only concern is that small, independent farmers were once again left out of the bargaining table.
Boy am I glad we bought our own pullets this year. With all this ridiculousness the price of eggs is going to skyrocket. We have the land to keep them, but I sure pity the poor people who won’t be able to utilize this rich source of protein in their diets at a reasonable price. Our dozen hens have an outdoor fenced yard, so I guess they are free range, but we had to put wire floor and roof on it to keep the predators out. It’s certainly not as the the AR folks would like to think though because those chickens are cannibals. Every day we have to spray half the flock with purple stuff because if one drop of red blood is showing they attack each other until the victim is dead. Then they eat it. I wish I was rich enough to be one of those evil factory farmers who could keep four or so hens together where they could live their lives peacefully, eating, sleeping and laying eggs without constantly running for their lives from their “sentient” sisters. Where, oh where, has common sense fled? If you want free range eggs, from chickens who eat all kinds of filthy stuff, and each other, by all means purchase them. If you want a cheap source of protein for your family, for goodness sake, let the farmers who can produce it do so. Let the farmers who know what they are doing, farm. And let the tree-huggers, who think they know it all, go hug a tree somewhere. It won’t hurt the tree, and the tree won’t give a darn. This old lady is tired of the know-it-alls telling everyone else what to do.
United Egg Producers better beef up their constitution and by-laws so that HSUS representatives cannot gain positions of power within their organization. HSUS is already operating this way in our legislatures, city and county governments, vet schools and law schools. It is one thing to deal with the fox, quite another to invite the fox into the henhouse. (My apologies to foxes!)
Victory snatched from the jaws of weakness is still victory. The most important result of this agreement is the likelihood that it will set a precedent for federal regulation of farm animal care standards: Those who are familiar with the federal Animal Welfare Act (covering breeding of dogs and assorted other pets and lab animals) will be able to judge how that works.
For egg producers this will be ‘peace in our time’ though just as in the original there be only temporary peace. (Roughly until the industry has spent the money to convert to the new system.) The metaphore for other animal agriculture is ‘thrown under the federal/animal rights bus.’
How many farmers—or other citizens, for that matter—believe we need to be expanding the reach of the federal goverment just now?
Independent egg producers, the rest of animal ag, and citizens generally need to mount a campaign against the idea of a federal law about henhouses.
and the APHIS director is a former HSUS attorney. the stage should be set for HSUS to be extremel-l-l-y careful. Maybe retire now before the house comes down on WPs head.
To paraphrase Mike Rowe; They’re (the chickens) warm in the winter, cool in the summer, they have plenty to eat and drink, they don’t have to combat predators, parasites, disease, or cannibalism - which part is inhumane?
It’s too bad that these idiot activists chose modern agriculture for their road to riches instead of, say, hungry children in the US, or funding some of the marvelous inventions created to replace our dependence on oil.
As late as Summer 2010 Wayne was gloating about how Prop 2 meant California was the jewel in the HSUS crown of cage free chickens.
http://hsus.typepad.com/wayne/2010/07/california-egg-bill.html
Now HSUS is removing links to every saying that as quickly as they can.
Of course no Californian voted for cage free eggs. Prop 2 required the conditions that enriched caging provided. But that wasn’t good enough for old Wayne. When one of the largest chicken ranches in the state switched over two chicken houses to enriched colony caging, Wayne went on record to say basically - we’ll see you in court.
Now HSUS is retreating from it’s own front. This is in no way, shape or form a win for HSUS. It’s a embarrassing defeat.
Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.
Add a comment:
That’s right. Seems the egg producers got tired of being “it”, so they tagged someone else. (Pork?)
Are the egg producers out of money or out of fight? They got a pretty good deal if you want to look at it this way: IF Congress passes a law that doesn’t kick in until 2030, every current chicken house will be more than 100% depreciated. The next 19 years will just be “business as usual”.
But, and it is a big “but”. They just gave HSUS a ton of credibility and more clout in fundraising. The cost of new housing will be small compared to that.