Mar 09 2010
HSUS Wishes They All Could Be California Chickens
Last Friday two Members of the U.S. Congress introduced a bill that they're calling the "Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act." HSUS's press release—and oh, yes, they're involved—lays out the case:
The bill, H.R. 4733, simply requires that any food purchased for federal programs comes from animals raised with enough room to stand up, lie down, turn around and stretch their limbs ...
"This bill requires meat producers who sell to the federal government to follow the same guidelines that California producers have in place to ensure the animals are raised humanely," Rep. [Elton] Gallegly said.
Well, not exactly. In 2008, Californians passed "Proposition 2," which made unprecedented changes in the way pigs, egg-laying hens, and veal calves will be raised in the future. The law doesn't take effect until 2015.
And if this whole federal-purchasing-law gambit sounds familiar, that's because it is. Forcing animal agriculture to bend Wayne Pacelle's will if they want to sell food to the National School Lunch Program (and other federal government programs) isn't a new idea. HSUS tried it in 2007. And it went over like a rotten egg, never making its way out of committee.
Why? Largely because HSUS's prescribed way of producing eggs adds a boatload of costs to the price of producing (and buying) every dozen. In today's economic climate, no politician wants to suggest paying $436 for a hammer when a cheaper version will do just fine. (Good for them.)
And besides, the so-called "humane" free-range egg production method might not translate into any real animal-welfare benefits for chickens. (For a primer, click here, then here, and then here,)
The most controversial part of Proposition 2 involved the requirement that cages for egg-laying hens will need to be huge, at least compared to the current industry standards. So unless something is done to repeal it in the next five years (check back with me then), we predict there won't be a single egg producer left in California other than small, niche-market "free range" farms. And they won't be able to produce nearly enough eggs to satisfy Californians' demands.
Guess where all those huevos will start coming from? I've spoken to two California egg producers who were scouting land in Mexico within a month of Prop 2's passage. What kind of "humane" standards (to say nothing of food-safety guarantees) do you suppose exist in Guadalajara? And those egg farmers who don't move across the border will just relocate to neighboring U.S. states.
We seriously doubt this latest HSUS legislative push will go anywhere. But it does point to the group's overall strategy, which is a state-by state march toward a federal law covering every omelet in all 50 states.
If they get there in my lifetime, the next step will be an academic study "proving" that free-range chickens are an oppressed minority, and their eggs are the product of institutionalized theft. You can bet on it.
p.s. Blogging will be sporadic for the next few days as we're on the road, in the air, and several time zones away from home.
Posted on 03/09/2010 at 08:56 AM by the HumaneWatch Team
The Best of HumaneWatch • Animal Agriculture • Gov't, Lobbying, Politics • (5) CommentsComments
It was also introduced in 2006 as HR 5557
Yesterday I received my weekly newspaper, The Capital Press and on pg. 7 there was an article “Residents fight to clean up Calif. chicken waste” by Jason Deren (associated press)..in short the community has been complaining for “years” about the stink from the waste ponds. The chicken farm was started in the late 1900’s and now the neighboring people want something done about the smell…What caught my attention is that the HSUS is suing the farm. Being a rancher, I know that there is a Water Resource board and the EPA..so if there was really a problem then they would have done something. Is the HSUS going to start suing all of us (Ranchers, farmers) for making our living??
I must say the HSUS has become a RABID PIT BULL ON STEROIDS…. they frighted me. I have been passing on your site whenever I can. Thank you for all that you are doing.
This bill lets animals be in a chute for rodeos. It lets animals be in a chute for veternayt treatmebt for the well being of the animaL It does not allow restriant for milking, pregnancy diagnosis, public health examinations, VD testing or other public health, herd health or wise animal husbandry reasons.
Do we know if those congressmen were re-elected? Those kind seem to be the ones who got the boot. At least we can hope. I think we have people getting into the political arena now that had their head in the sand until they found out what is going to affect them. About time is all I can say. I’m not sure if it is not too late to pull this goofy stuff back out where it belongs but every little bit helps. Please be very careful when you come against these people. Their agenda is very important to them and they are the kind that will hurt you when they find out that you are getting in their way. I was a lobbyist to the Kansas house and senate about 20 years ago and stopped because I still had children at home to rear but I can tell you. these people do not play fair or nice. This group is beginning to be heard and they will not like that.
Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.
Add a comment:
Good grief! Could they have found a program less able to afford the extra expenses of their ridiculous demands than the school lunch program? Perhaps soup kitchens?