Mar 23 2010

Moving the Chains: A Shell Game

When I speak to a group of people about the deception inherent in how the Humane Society of the United States promotes itself, I get a lot of questions. I don't keep score, but I think the one I'm asked the most goes something like this: "David, we all kinda sense that HSUS is moving in the same direction as PETA regarding animal agriculture, but can you prove it?"

My answer usually sounds like this: "Well ... No one can know what's in another man's heart, but I think the proof is in the pudding. HSUS clearly believes that some animal-ag practices are superior to others, but ask yourself this: Have you ever seen the group's leadership actually endorse (much less consume) any kind of meat, egg, or dairy food?"

It's a question worth asking. In fact, I asked it in a Congressional hearing a few years ago, while Wayne Pacelle and I were sitting (both literally and figuratively) at opposite ends of a long table. It seems to me that if there is such a thing as "humane meat," Wayne Pacelle and Paul Shapiro and all their underlings ought to be ordering it for the office Christmas party. Or at least putting their corporate logo on it in the grocery store. (The idea of "humane" meat, of course, suggests that all the rest is "inhumane." I'm not down with that, but it seems like HSUS is.)

Would they ever do it? We had an interesting chance to find out a few years ago when a "cage-free" egg company put out a press release. And then retracted it.

Here's what happened. On March 31, 2008 a company called "Eggology" issued a press release. I noticed this one because it suggested the impossible:

Humane Society Endorsed Eggology Egg Whites

Yes, you read that right. Eggology declared two years ago that it was the "First Egg Products Brand ... Endorsed By The Humane Society Of The United States." The press release even included a quote from HSUS's Paul Shapiro. It almost seemed like a legitimate course-correction for HSUS.

For about two hours, anyway. That's apparently how long it took for the feathers to fly, and for Eggology to issue a "corrected" release, sans HSUS endorsement, and minus the Shapiro quote:

Eggology, the leader in the all-natural egg whites industry, has become the only liquid egg brand to be "Certified Humane" by Virginia-based animal welfare auditing organization, Humane Farm Animal Care.

So in retrospect, an egg endorsement from HSUS was about as likely as a veal endorsement from PETA.

Now, I don't know if the Eggology people truly misunderstood HSUS's position on eggs, or if maybe their PR people just got HSUS confused with the "Certified Humane" labeling scheme. (Confusion would be forgivable, since HSUS co-founded the "Humane Farm Animal Care" organization that runs that eco-label program.)

But this much is quite clear: HSUS was not happy with the public perception that it had endorsed an animal protein product. Not even egg whites from "cage-free" layer hens. Eggology was mightily embarrassed (I won't jump to the obvious "egg" cliché here...) to have to retract a press release. There's no way the company did it without some serious prompting from HSUS.

Oh, and by the way—to my knowledge, there's exactly one food product that carries HSUS's endorsement (and its logo): Tofurky.

But my larger point is this: While Eggology was retracting its press release in 2008, HSUS was spending millions of dollars to force every California egg farmer to move in the direction of "cage-free" production. HSUS is trying to push the same program in Ohio this year. It's already succeeded in several other states. If 100 percent cage-free production were really HSUS's final goal for eggs, don't you think the group would endorse its most outspoken practitioner? Don't you think someone from the HSUS head office would ... you know, eat a few of those eggs?

They don't. They won't. And that's fine. They're free to make their choices. But while everyone is thinking that a federal law restricting cages in egg production would be a Touchdown for HSUS, the animal rights group understands that it's really just a First Down. They'll keep moving the chains, and they'll have all the momentum for the next few plays. (Not to torture this metaphor too much, but the Touchdown is a vegan United States. And these people don't kick field goals.)

I would love to see a reporter or three pin Shapiro and Pacelle down on this:

  • "Mr. Pacelle, can you name a specific meat, dairy, or egg brand that you and the Humane Society of the United States would be willing to endorse?"
  • "Mr. Shapiro, if you get a federal law to make every state switch to the kind of livestock production mandated by California's 'Proposition 2' law, will you and HSUS be satisfied with your achievement and dissolve the animal-ag part of your organization?"
  • "Dr. Greger, is there such a thing as 'humane meat'? If so, where can we buy some? If not, what's the difference between your group and PETA?"

The questions kinda write themselves, but only after you understand what's going on.

Related People

Related Organizations

Posted on 03/23/2010 at 07:45 AM by the HumaneWatch Team
Animal AgricultureEggs • (14) Comments

Share

 

Comments

EGGGGGCELLENT!!

Posted by Mary Lou on 03/23 at 09:42 AM

i love eggs and if i feel the need to eat them i will.

Posted by Levi Bertolotto on 03/23 at 11:56 AM

I guess my four hens housed in a chicken tractor would have to go if that touchdown were made.

Ummmmm…..you think the same executives of HSUS know what a chicken tractor is?

Breakfast around our house sure is good!

Posted by Kim on 03/23 at 05:14 PM

I’m a bit confused. It seems downright stupid to expect HSUS to endorse a meat/egg/dairy product and use that excuse to say that they’re trying to eradicate all of that from the American diet. PETA endorsed KFC Canada’s vegan chicken sandwich after they dropped their campaign against them, but does that mean they endorse KFC? No.

Posted by craig on 03/23 at 07:22 PM

@Craig—I don’t think anyone expected HSUS to endorse an egg product, precisely because the group’s leaders are all vegans. I think you have it turned around a bit with the PETa analogy. We’re not talking about a vegan “egg replacer.”  And if PET ahad actually endorsed a real chicken product of any kind, THAT would certainly be news which would throw my conception of the group off-kilter.

Posted by David on 03/23 at 07:35 PM

Its Not about the Egg, which is something I’ve been telling people for years. Glad to see some people are starting to listen. To bad we can’t get corporations to understand that the humaniacs don’t eat what we eat.
BlackPowderBill

Posted by Bill on 03/24 at 05:57 AM

ok im 16 years old and i live in warsaw indiana and at our fair this year legislators are comeing to help not only the beef industrie but other meet probucts etc. and hsus(humane society of united states) has already shut down michigan state fair and we are not going to let them shut down our fair they think by putting animals in cages or pastures its keeping them imhumane and its not god put them on this earth for a reason and no one gets that!!!

Posted by Adriana nelson on 03/24 at 11:35 AM

Good for you, Adriana! You can be kind to animals and respect them without giving up their use. The world is based on the food chain, and while we should not be cruel, we certainly have the right to eat animals and use them to produce eggs, milks, etc. You can bet that if THEY were on top and WE were the animals, they would be eating us! I am so glad Indiana is standing up to these fanatics.

Posted by Sharyn Hutchens on 03/24 at 02:32 PM

Cows and chickens (as well as humans) are herbivores (http://www.scribd.com/doc/94656/The-Comparative-Anatomy-of-Eating)... therefore if they were on top of the food chain they would be “using” us for food.  If we followed the food chain everyone would be vegan, but we choose to omnivores (which isn’t a bad thing)...  But there isn’t anyone who can prove that cows milk is meant for humans.  It is made for calves.  Human milk is made for humans and we are suppose to be weened off of it after infancy (like every other mammal).  Once you realize that you can start putting other animal products into perspective.  Sure eggs are delicious, but are they meant to be consumed by humans… probably not.  Is there really any difference between the meat of a horse, cow, dog, or human?  Then why are some of those wrong to eat and some are ok.  The point is we choose to eat what we eat because it tastes good and we enjoy it and being at the top of the food chain allows this.  But don’t say its natural or what was intended because that is just false.  We are the “supreme beings” of this world and we choose what is on our plate.

Posted by James on 03/24 at 05:48 PM

@James—I’m no evolutionary biologist, but I can’t help thinking that at some point along the way, our early ancestors’ choices (hunting and eating to avoid an early anemic death) became hard-coded as biological imperatives.

Isn’t it possible that our behaviors are driven (at least in part) by silent evolutionary forces that we don’t understand? I’m happy to be persuaded that I’m all wet on this. It’s just a common sense thing to me.

I’m not, of course, saying that we can’t resist these hard-wired forces. I’m just suggesting that our default position as human beings is to obey them.

Posted by David on 03/24 at 08:59 PM

I would love to hear someone pin down Wayne as to why he is not interested in protecting the flora of the world—especially since it is the primary source of nutrition of those vegan wannabees.  It just seems that radishes, carrots, apples, and all the types of greens should be able to flourish unfettered and not be forced to grown in greenhouse rows or in outdoor rows for that matter.  When, oh when, will he stand up for vegetable rights!

Posted by john galt on 03/27 at 05:30 PM

Chickens are omnivores, you knucklehead! Are bugs, snakes, worms, grubs and even mice vegetables? Cows and horses are herbivores, dogs and people are omnivores, So there is your difference.

Posted by Mike Myers on 03/28 at 11:51 AM

Yeah, that was my mistake Chickens are omnivores (unlike humans).  That WAS a knucklehead sentence.. i was too fired up to proofread (obviously) smile

Posted by James on 04/02 at 07:55 AM

my question for wayne:
Mr. Pacelle, you speak of “humane’ meat and “humane slaughter”.. When will the HSUS open their ‘humane” farm to show the world how to do these things?  When will the tours begin in every state.. of “humane” egg production, meat production and dairy production.. and of course .. when will we see the animal “humanely slaughtered “by you.. What?? never.. why Mr Pacelle how can that be?  LOL

Posted by bestuvall on 04/07 at 06:29 PM

Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.

Name:

Email: (will not be displayed)

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

« Back to blog homepage