Apr 06 2010

These Are the People HSUS is Opposing

Ohio Governor Ted Strickland (D) has appointed the first ten members of his state's Livestock Care Standards Board. This is the regulatory body, since carbon-copied in over a dozen states, that Ohio voters overwhelmingly approved last November as having the final say on how animal agriculture should be conducted in the Buckeye State.

Here's the list:

  • Stacey Atherton of Newark, co-owner of Shipley Farms.
  • Robert Cole of Gahanna, a retired U.S. Department of Agriculture executive.

  • Harold Dates of Cincinnati, chief of the city’s Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

  • Tony Forshey of Columbus, veterinarian for the state Department of Agriculture.

  • Lisa Hamler-Fugitt of Reynoldsburg, executive director of the state Association of Second Harvest Foodbanks and legislative liaison for the state Alliance of Boys & Girls Clubs.

  • Jerry Lahmers of Newcomerstown, owner and operator of a family farm.

  • Jeffrey LeJeune of Wooster, associate professor for food and animal health at Ohio State’s Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center.

  • Bobby Moser of Dublin, dean of Ohio State’s College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.

  • Leon Weaver of Montpelier, owner of Bridgewater Dairy and a board member of the state Livestock Coalition and Dairy Industry Forum.

  • Jeff Wuebker of Versailles, co-owner of Wuebker Farms and president of the state Soybean Association.

Ohio's Agriculture Department Director (Robert Boggs) will also sit on the 13-member panel. State House Speaker Armond Budish (D) and state Senate President Bill Harris (R) each get to appoint one member too.

These are the people whose judgment HSUS believes is so horribly insufficient that voters simply must tie their hands and force them to demand HSUS-approved methods of handling farm animals.

Gee ... four farmers, an SPCA director, a food bank executive, an Ohio State agriculture professor and the Ag School dean, a veterinarian, and a retired USDA expert?

Horrible. Hacks. Unqualified. They could clearly stand to learn about animal welfare from a bunch of activists who have no experience raising animals for food.

Yep—It's going to be a fascinating election season in the Buckeye State.

Related Organizations

Posted on 04/06/2010 at 02:41 PM by the HumaneWatch Team

Animal AgricultureGov't, Lobbying, Politics • (9) Comments

Share

Comments 

Pretty impressive picks.  I wonder who HSUS would want?  Let’s see - Wayne of course, Ingrid, and whoever other AR fanatics they could recruit. 
I have a lot of faith in this board.  Thanks, HumaneWatch for the great job of keeping us informed!

Posted by Mary on 04/06 at 05:28 PM

HSUS and ASPCA are vociferously opposing similar Bills and efforts in other states.  You can always tell when they issue “alerts” because of sudden internet chatter about the “evil farmers”. 

These groups want to the public to believe that they are the only ones would could possibly have anything to offer regarding animal welfare.  In truth, they offer little to nothing.

But they aren’t going to stop until they have law enforcement and regulatory authority over all animal owners in the US.  They’re taking it county by county, and state by state.

Posted by Bywater on 04/06 at 07:57 PM

They did an awesome job in their picks, especially Jeff, (a crop farmer and pig farmer) he’s as honest as they come and works harder than most.  Way to go Ohio and thank YOU to Humanewatch and David for their amazing information.

Posted by Debbie on 04/06 at 07:57 PM

I agree..Jeff is solid and honest.  thought maybe they would consider Tad Gross, a well respected egg producer.

Wayne is going down in this election…the truth is coming to the top.

Posted by Humphrey on 04/06 at 10:46 PM

An excellent list!  I stopped just short of cheering when I heard that Ohio passed it.

That said, there is one argument made by HSUS and their ilk that I have never heard a good answer to; that is that those who are most knowledgeable in matters of agriculture are those that have the most to gain by seeing it prosper (and so, it has been argued, decreasing regulation and oversight on it).

Quite obviously this is false and yet to laymen, it’s hard to come up with a good retort. While it’s tempting to say that farmers, ranchers, and veterinarians have the best interests of the animals at heart, that is precisely what HSUS denies and it would be great to have an argument that didn’t revolve around it.  As yet, I haven’t heard anything that makes good, solid sense to people who don’t know agriculture.

Posted by Max on 04/07 at 08:47 PM

Max, here is what I would answer to that argument.  With HSUS and other AR organizations pushing for zero animal agriculture, it is more important than ever for farmers and ranchers to self-regulate and self-govern their practices because if they do NOT, the public and HSUS will surely drive them out of business.  They have a vested interest in a good outcome.  Additionally, these people have the knowledge to educate the public on what animal agriculture is about.  They are not raising ‘Lassie’ in that barn.  : )  People need to understand that, as they are so far removed from reality these days, that they buy into the emotional propaganda from the HSUS.

Posted by Mary on 04/08 at 02:34 PM

Max,
A reasonable response to the layman is that most industries are regulated by well-respected, informed, practicing members of that industry.  Regardless if the branch is cosmetology, pharmacy, medical, dentistry, veterinary, insurance, legal, educators, etc - that branch is likely regulated by a combination of members of the industry and members of the public with a few elected officials/public servant types.  Why?  Well, mainly because it seems silly to expect beauticians to set the guidelines for practicing medicine in this state or to have physicians setting education policy. 

Indeed, there is a tension in any regulatory group between promoting the profession (at its best) and public suspicious that the entity will end up promoting the profession at all costs.  However, if you take a look at any of Ohio’s Boards and Commissions (conveniently available here: http://ohio.gov/agencies/), we have well established process (open meetings, public records, consent of the Senate, lengthy rulemaking process) as well as structural (bipartisan elements, members of public, competing interests) as well as the “non-tangible” (no appointing entity wants to look foolish if it appoints the proverbial bad apple) to keep the system in line.  Is it always perfect?  Nope. 

But I still think this is a better process than one where non-parties make the decision to regulate the industry.  After all, “A dentist, a doctor, and a teacher walk into a bar” may make for a clever joke, but it would probably not be a good way to govern liquor sales in a state.

Posted by Beth on 04/12 at 03:37 PM

These members voted “yes” to the confinement of baby calves to become fatty veal. I hardly see the good in these people.

Posted by Audrey on 03/15 at 10:49 AM

Audrey, you need to visit with some veal calves.  They are quite content in their ‘confinement’.  That confinement keeps them safe, believe it or not.  You obviously have no idea for the reasons they are in these stalls.  Maybe you should do some research.  And just for the record, veal is NOT fatty.  It is wonderfully lean meat.

Posted by Mary on 03/16 at 02:58 PM

Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.

Add a comment:

Name:

Email: (will not be displayed)

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

« Back to blog homepage