Jul 19 2010

They Got A “D”

What a way for the Humane Society of the United States to start the week.

The American Institute of Philanthropy (AIP)—a highly respected charity watchdog—just released its quarterly rankings for selected charities all across America. HSUS and the Fund for Animals (which became a part of HSUS in 2005) have both been downgraded to a letter grade of “D.” (Even the kooks at PETA managed to skate by with a C-plus.)

HSUS had been holding steady at “C-minus” for the last two quarters—certainly nothing to brag about. But now AIP reports that HSUS’s fundraising costs are as high as 49 percent, meaning it can cost HSUS 49 cents to raise every dollar. That’s up from a high of 40 cents in AIP's previous rankings of HSUS.

HSUS’s spending on its actual programs (you know, what a charity is supposed to do) now also bottoms out at 49 percent. In other words, HSUS can spend less than half of its budget trying to actually help animals. How embarrassing.

First Charity Navigator downgraded HSUS in April, and now AIP has put HSUS near the bottom of its rankings. Looks like HSUS’s “factory fundraising” practices are finally catching up with it.

But cheer up, HSUS employees. You still have that sweet pension plan.

Posted on 07/19/2010 at 07:47 PM by the HumaneWatch Team
The Best of HumaneWatchDocument AnalysisFundraising • (12) Comments

Share

 

Comments

Suppose that’s why HSUS is becoming D-fensive?

Posted by Cheryl on 07/20 at 11:31 AM

I think so.

Posted by regan h on 07/20 at 01:44 PM

Why is it that the newspapers don’t pick up on stories like this?  It seems to me this is just as newsworthy as any other animal story they might print. 

At some point, the misinformation that comes from the H$US is going to come back and haunt them.  We are starting to see some of this taking place on this and other websites, but certainly mainstream print media will soon start to pick up stories like this and start to inform the rest of the world about the furtive shennanigans of this animal rights group.

Posted by Michael A on 07/21 at 10:15 AM

AIP grades charities just once a year - the new D grade is based on their 2008 tax returns.

Note that while the A- rated Humane Farming Association has an open book symbol next to its name, HSUS does not.  An open book means that the charity provided requested financial documents (in addition to the readily available 990s) to AIP.  The vast majority of highly rated charities cooperate. Some D and F rated charities do as well.  This lack of tranparency is another red flag indicating HSUS has much to hide. I’d bet HSUS would get an F if the full financial picture (Enron-style accounting; unreported fundraising costs, etc.) were available to AIP.

Posted by sharon on 07/21 at 02:39 PM

It’s curious to me that an entire website/group is devoted to “keeping an eye” on the HSUS.

Rather than keeping an eye on them, if you can do it better - why don’t you?

Posted by Gary on 07/21 at 04:51 PM

Curious? Okay. But necessary too. If we had the resources that HSUS has ($130+ million every year), there’s no question that we could do it better. Most high school graduates could do it better. But we’re not willing to deceive the public in order to collect that kind of money.

Watchdogging has a long and storied tradition in America. Consider a group like “OMB Watch”—I’m sure they believe they could do a better job of managing the government’s money, but that’s not their role. Similarly, practically everyone you see on newspaper op-ed pages is criticizing someone else’s performance instead of trying to replace them. Does that make the criticism invalid?

Posted by David on 07/21 at 05:11 PM

The HSUS has been going down the tubes when it comes to helping the animals for a long time. However, when Wayne took over he has made it where he feels everyone in the world (no lie) should be vegans and that’s his goal with all of his fights for the animals. I have nothing against people not eating meat etc in fact I’m all for it however trying to “make” everyone vegan is like trying to make everyone in the world one religion. It’s not going to happen. That’s where all the donation dollars are going to and until they get him and his cronies out of there, nothing can be corrected.

Posted by Kathie on 07/25 at 08:53 AM

Hey Gary,
whats wrong, your buddies getting busted for scamming people have you a little upset? Or does the truth bother you that much. I love this group, and wish they had more to keep all these scammers on their toes. You have any elderly people in your family? well if you do go ask who they give their money to, and then ask if they know how to find out what happens to that money.
Knowledge is the only thing people cannot take away from you, I thank God for groups like HumaneWatch. Awesome job!

Posted by Derek on 07/30 at 05:40 PM

To me the saddest thing is the exploitation of abused animals to raise millions of dollars, half of which never go to the animals defense. Meanwhile, during all this fund-raising, millions more animals are dying.

Also, Kathie is right about Wayne’s drive to turn everyone into vegans. I am one out of choice. People either choose it or don’t. No one can “make” them change what they eat.

Posted by jen on 09/03 at 01:14 PM

I find it curious that anyone would not be thrilled a group would have the time, money and resources to watch over any organization that begs for money.

I would be (and am in this case) grateful to know where my money would have gone so I could be aware there were better places to donate to that my money would go to more than a pension plan.

The cool thing is, if the organization begging is being completely up front about what are spending the money on, and if it is equal to the reason they *appear* to be raising it, for example, to help the sad little puppies and kitties in the pound, or starving children in another country, or whatever, then they should be proud, and WANT someone to watch over them, and show off their ratings by the watchdog site.

Not seeing that so much with HSUS I guess.

Humanewatch is not making this stuff up - it has been going on for at least 25 years, that is how long I have despised the HSUS after doing some investigation way back then, when even as as teenager, I wondered why they turned my $20 donation into $50 worth of junk mail and crappy trinket gifts/garbage they kept sending me.

Even as a kid, I figured out this was not making sound financial sense.

Posted by Carla on 09/03 at 01:17 PM

Thank you, Humane Watch. Clearly the charity reviewers only consider the information submitted by those who wish to be reviewed unless organizations like Humane Watch make the facts public. I will not rely on charity reviewers any more.

Posted by dogcatcher on 09/03 at 06:27 PM

I have found that the best way to help a lot of these poor animals starts in your own backyard. Visit your local shelters as they always need help. This can be your time as well as hard good donations like food and cleaning supplies. If we all help our own shelters then we know and can see where our dollars go…just a thought….

Posted by sheryl on 09/04 at 12:12 PM

Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.

Name:

Email: (will not be displayed)

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

« Back to blog homepage