Feb 24 2010

YellowFail 2.0?

By now, you probably know about the holy terror the Yellow Fail Tail Wine company unleashed on itself this month when it announced a $100,000 donation to the Humane Society of the United States. To put it mildly, the peasants with pitchforks revolted. Pressure got so bad for Yellow Tail that the company was practically forced to apologize, and promised that it would never make the same mistake again. Here's one sentence from Yellow Tail's letter to the Animal Agriculture Alliance:

We pledge to you that any future support for animal welfare will go to organizations specifically devoted to hands-on care, such as rescue, sterilization, feeding, or disaster assistance.

Now that the dust has settled, the interesting part is that Yellow Tail is just one of nearly 40 companies that HSUS describes as "featured corporate supporters." Some of these are mom-and-pop outfits; others are Fortune 100 companies.

The full list (dated November 9, 2009) from HSUS's own website, is after the jump. We're not advocating any boycotts, but if those peasants wanted to dust off their pitchforks and light a few torches, who could object? We've linked each company name to its corporate "contact us" page, except for Yellow Tail. We think they've had enough, don't you?

HSUS "Featured Corporate Supporters"
UPDATED with Facebook group
 

AuthentEscapes Mighty Fine
Bank of America  (FB) Neue Galerie New York  (FB)
BB&T (FB) NSF Clothing  (FB)
Buffalo Exchange  (FB) Oreck  (FB)
Carivintâs Winery Organic Bouquet  (FB)
Charity Partners Petco Stores/Foundation  (FB) (FB)
Cheeky Monkey Jewelry  (FB) Pet e-Tailing
Crocodiles Not Waterlilies Petfinder  (FB)
Check Gallery PetSmart Charities  (FB)
DoGreatGood.com  (FB) Pilot Travel Centers  (FB)
Ebay Giving Works  (FB) Prai Beauty Group  (FB)
eFundraising Precious Cat
GreaterGood Somerset Entertainment
Grounds for Change  (FB) Tisbest  (FB)
Harland Clarke  (FB) ViMax Publishing
Jakks Pacific  (FB) (FB) (FB) Xerox  (FB)
Land Rover North America  (FB) [Yellow Tail]
Legacy Interactive Zazzle.com  (FB)
Microsoft Corporation  (FB)  



Related Organizations

Posted on 02/24/2010 at 02:37 PM by the HumaneWatch Team

Fundraising & Money • (37) Comments

Share

Comments 

I appreciate the information and the links. 

Last November, Ohioans voted to have a Board of Ohioans that would determine Humane treatment of animals in Ohio.  HSUS is trying to put it back on the ballot and take away our right to self-rule.,

I have emailed the parent company of Yellow Tail wine and asked them to make a $100,000 donation to one of the Ohio organizations that is trying to stop HSUS.  It will be interesting to see how they answer!

Posted by Savannah on 02/24 at 04:59 PM

sent this a moment ago- similar letters will follow to any business supporting HSUS I used to frequent!

To Whom It May Concern,

I recently learned that Pilot Travel Centers are listed as a “Featured Corporate Sponsor” for the Humane Society of the United States.

Were you aware that the HSUS owns, operates and is affiliated with a grand total of ZERO companion animal shelters across the country?  And that less than one half of one percent of all their millions in donations goes to hands on care of shelter animals? Just $.0045 cents on every dollar. Most goes to lobbying efforts to stop animal agriculture and pet ownership.

I travel frequently in my work as a handler for top quality show dogs and spends thousands a year at Pilot Travel Centers. I am sorry to say I can no longer support your company, and will take my business to other service providers for as long as PTC continues to support HSUS.  I cannot in good conscious allow my income, through your donations, to be used to support such a deceptive organization- one who would happily take my companion animals away and prevent me from every owning another again.

I urge you to reconsider where your charitable donations are made and direct them in the future to groups who provide significant hands on care for abandoned and neglected pets.

Thank you

Posted by Dannielle Romeo on 02/24 at 05:19 PM

I just sent a letter to Petfinder.com asking them to withdraw their support of HSUS and they say they weren’t aware that they were a financial sponsor….
Any input?

Posted by Kelly Bartels on 02/24 at 05:38 PM

Allow me to play devils advocate with your position. 

If the HSUS were directly involved with animal shelters all over the country, you could simply snap a picture every time an animal looked like it wasn’t “happy” at an HSUS animal shelter.

You could then post these unhappy animal shelter pictures all over the web and associate them with the HSUS.

No matter what the HSUS does, you can play the contrarian card.

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/24 at 05:40 PM

Thank you so much for compiling this info!! You’ve done all of the hard work for us!

Posted by Life With Dogs on 02/24 at 06:41 PM

Alessandro,
So what you are suggesting is that if HSUS could actually be linked to an animal shelter they may be treated in the same way they treat others.  Maybe they would even be caught on camera actually doing what “animal shelters” do, killing animals.  Now how would that look up against their phony fund-raising ads with the sad cross-eyed animals?

Posted by Mike Kerley on 02/24 at 11:52 PM

Hi Mike.

The difference is HSUS goes after people who both abuse animals AND profit from it. If the HSUS went into the shelter “business” it would not be to make money, yet the risk would still be there from people who simply want to believe bad things about the HSUS and would use their association with animal shelters to condemn the HSUS every time they found an animal suffering at a shelter.

I think the HSUS is more concerned with puppy mills and attempting to slow down the growth of puppy mills because the resulting off spring from all the abandoned animals grows by the day.

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/25 at 01:33 AM

Allessandro—

You could apply your devil’s-advocate logic to circuses, ranches, farms, etc. too. 

No matter what some egg producers do, for instance, HSUS can “frame” a photograph or two to make it look bad.

I’ve always been suspicious of groups that shoot 100 hours of video and then show the 30 seconds that make their target look the worst.

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/25 at 02:06 AM

Alessandro, I can see your heart is in the right place.

By donating and volunteering locally to shelter/rescue programs, people can accomplish more to help animals directly.

if HSUS really cared about these problems, they wouldn’t sit on information until it was more profitable for them to use. they would spend their lobbying time stopping the import of ‘rescue’ animals from foreign countries- after all, why should they be brought in to publicly funded shelters and private rescues by the truck full if our shelters are already overburdened?  why not push for legislation that would also displaced homeowners to keep their well behaved pets with their loving families when forced out due to foreclosure? why do they accept hundreds of thousands in donations after airing a ‘raid’- showing HSUS folk in highly visible gear, instead of handing over the money raised from promoting their so called participation in closing these facilities to the foster homes and organizations that actually take in all those animals and pay for their care? why does a man who has publicly stated “I don’t have a hands-on fondness for animals…To this day I don’t feel bonded to any non-human animal” pose for the cameras with them all the time?

It’s time to end the lies. Every dollar sent to HSUS takes money—meaning food, medical care and possibly new homes—from a shelter dog in your own community.

Posted by Dannielle Romeo on 02/25 at 05:41 PM

David, as a general rule, our economy tries to maximize profits above all.  Now factor in that animals really don’t have a voice in how they are treated.

How can it be better for animals to have nobody speaking on their behalf?

I can make a case that the meat industry is far too powerful a lobby already, far more powerful than the HSUS could ever hope to be.

I find it shocking that I have to special order a vegetarian or vegan meal at most fast food places and I’m not either.  I’d like a real choice were I to go to a fast food place, and right now that does not exist.

So how can I take seriously that the HSUS is the real threat when most restaurants have a menu that consists of over 90% meat and seafood fare?

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/25 at 06:13 PM

“Every dollar sent to HSUS takes money—meaning food, medical care and possibly new homes—from a shelter dog in your own community.”

Very well put, Dannielle!  this echoes the PETA/HSUS claptrap about how buying puppies from breeders supposedly kills shelter dogs.  Only this makes much more sense since of course most of the money donated to HSUS is done so in the mistaken belief that the donation goes to a shelter.

Maybe some smart person out there can refine this a bit into a catch phrase we can put on bumper stickers and T-shirts?  Like “Donating to HSUS kills shelter pets”?

Posted by bbdane on 02/25 at 08:30 PM

@bbdane—I like “Save a pet, not a pension.”

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/25 at 10:47 PM

@Alessandro—Restaurants are in business to make money, and that only happens when they please their customers. It’s ridiculous to insist that every restaurant cater to the desires of the 1 percent of us who are vegan.

And if you’re able to “special order” a ta fast-food place, I’d say it sounds like you managed to have lunch without bending your ethics. Well done.

I think it’s a fine choice to be a vegetarian (or a libertarian, or a Unitarian…) It’s a free country. Do whatever pleases you. But don’t expect the world to reorganize itself around your choices. That’s arrogant.

If I decide tomorrow that I’m only going to eat orange-colored foods that are harvested on alternate Tuesdays in the southern hemisphere, I’d better be prepared for the reality that I’m going to be the one who’s inconvenienced.

Here’s my bottom line: You have an absolute right to eat what you want. But you (and no one else) are responsible for the ramifications of that choice. Don’t make it your neighbor’s problem. And don’t preach.

Too much to ask?

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/25 at 10:53 PM

I am not a vegan.  However, what is so bad about incorporating a vegan diet into one’s regular diet on a regular basis?  Being a meat eater doesn’t necessarily mean one has to eat meat at every meal, does it?

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/25 at 11:08 PM

Re: “Every dollar sent to HSUS takes money—meaning food, medical care and possibly new homes—from a shelter dog in your own community.” That’s not true on a bunch of levels. I admit that when I worked at a shelter, and HSUS first opened an office in the state, I thought the same thing. But we didn’t lose donors to them. In fact, I had people telling us they were donating to us at the suggestion of HSUS. And personally, I donate to local and national groups, for humans and animals. I understand that the groups focus on different things and are able to accomplish different things so support the range of groups. The fact is that HSUS’s job has never been to be a funder for shelters and they don’t hide that.

Re: “this echoes the PETA/HSUS claptrap about how buying puppies from breeders supposedly kills shelter dogs. ” Can you show me where HSUS says that? On their website, I did see info about how to choose a responsible breeder. And from what I’ve seen, the main objection to puppies from mills is that selling those pups creates a marketplace that keeps the mother and dad dogs in lockup for life. The breed club for my breed (and many others) has ethical guidelines that prohibit selling puppies to a broker or store. No responsible breeder would sell to a pet store.

Re: ” Only this makes much more sense since of course most of the money donated to HSUS is done so in the mistaken belief that the donation goes to a shelter.” The only donor who can’t figure out what HSUS does and doesn’t do is one who never looks at their website or publications. It’s pretty clear what they work on. You might not like what they do, but it would be hard to say they’re hiding that they work on farm animal issues, dogfighting, wildlife issues, puppy mills, seal hunt, etc etc. It’s all right there.

Posted by dogmom on 02/25 at 11:17 PM

“What is so bad about incorporating a vegan diet into one’s regular diet on a regular basis?”

Nothing at all—if that’s your choice. There’s also nothing wrong with eating animal protein at every meal.

Nobody here is trying to convince you to eat bacon. Why are you trying to convince everyone to deprive themselves of what they enjoy?

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/26 at 12:30 AM

Dannielle -

Your line about “every dollar donated to HSUS” is priceless.

May I share it with others?

Posted by Debz on 02/26 at 02:02 AM

David, there can’t be a “choice” if non-meat items are not even on the menu.  I’m not even suggesting meat and non meat items be a 50/50 split, but right now it’s probably more like a 96% meat, 4% vegan/vegetarian split.

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/26 at 02:26 AM

Alessandro, do you really expect every rib joint, churrascaria steakhouse, and cheeseburger stand to stock seitan patties and “not dogs”?

I think if they could make a profit selling them, they’d all do it. Restaurants don’t discriminate against anyone’s palate, but they’re not in business to throw money away. The fact that your favorite entree is hard to find is just an economic indication that hardly anyone buys it.

If turnips or rhubarb became the “it” food tomorrow, I guarantee every smart restaurateur would be experimenting with putting it on the menu. I’m not a big fan of rhubarb, but it wouldn’t annoy me if I saw it on lots of menus.

And I’m curious about your 96-to-4 split estimate. I don’t think more than 4 percent of Americans are strict vegetarians. Seems fair to me.

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/26 at 02:49 AM

David, if 4% of the population is vegan, and 4% of the food offered in a restaurant is vegan, you say that sounds about right.

But if what if half of the 96% who eat meat would gladly love an occasional vegan meal. Maybe they would gladly eat vegan twice a week but don’t because a vegan choice is not even on the menu.

It’s kind of similar to the way congress works. The House of Representatives is based on the population per state, but then the senate gives every state equal power irrespective of population.

Right now there is no “senate”, and this has created an imbalance of choice.

Anyways, I don’t know if this discussion has strayed off topic or not.  By the way, Morningstar makes some vegan buffalo wings that are a winner. (I don’t work for them nor know anybody who does).

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/26 at 03:16 AM

Okay—This is the last thing I’ll say on the subject.

I’ll bet you $100 that every restaurant chain in America with more than 25 locations has paid a market research company to scientifically survey its customers to find out what they want.

If half of them wanted a vegan meal occasionally, it would be on the menu already. I guarantee it.

The marketplace sorts these things out.
Look at what’s happening at Yale University:

According to the most recent Yale Dining survey, conducted this past September, only 1.3 percent of Yale students identify as having a vegan diet, absent of all animal products. And yet, often to the chagrin of meat-eating Yalies ... vegan dishes usually represent one of six or seven entrée options at each hot meal served in Yale’s residential college dining halls ...

While Dining administrators said providing vegan options is not inefficient, some students said they question the relative over-representation of vegan options on Yale’s menus.

Within Yale’s residential colleges, space limits the number of entrée options that can be served on a given night, and some students interviewed said that, given the small population of vegans at Yale, it is not necessary to cook vegan food in each dining hall.

“[The vegan options] take room away from other food that tastes better,” Ed Shaer ’13 said, noting that because each college’s servery space is limited, he would rather see an additional non-vegan option in the place of the vegan option.

And I said no more than 4 percent is probably vegetarian. I think the vegan numbers are south of 1 percent.

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/26 at 03:31 AM

David, I just want to point out that is our IVY League schools such as Yale that produced educated financial Wall Street wizards that have sold off Main Street to other countries, destroying the infrastructure of our own country in the process.

I’m not so sure I would be bragging that they are on your side.
just saying.

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/26 at 04:15 AM

Alessandro—-

With all due respect, we are talking about the law of supply and demand here. There is little demand for veg, so many establishments will choose not to supply.

I have noticed many restaurants have begun offering vegetarian options, however. And if it is not a chain, you can probably ask—- if there is nothing specifically listed on the menu, they still might be able to accommodate.

But I am absolutely against any business being forced to do so.

You complain about “no choice.” There is always a choice.

A person does have the choice to go somewhere else if a particular restaurant does not have any items to their liking on the menu. I, for example, would likely choose not to eat at a sushi establishment.

Vote with your wallet. Go somewhere else.

Posted by Debz on 02/26 at 06:23 AM

Um ... I went to Dartmouth. Is that really the best you can do?

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/26 at 09:49 AM

Debz, there is also little demand for alternative sources of energy, but that does not mean it is wise to keep destroying our economy by overextending our military presence to wherever we are concerned about interrupted oil supplies.

David, The Yale students are spoiled and pathetic and I’ll tell everybody I know. They are now on my boycott list.  I’ll never work with anyone from Yale if the students actually think they are victims because one out of 6 or 7 meal offerings is vegan.

I thought it was an April Fools joke when I first read the article.

Posted by Alessandro Machi on 02/26 at 11:31 AM

I can’t speak for Yale, but I’m sure they’re just crushed.

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/26 at 11:38 AM

Alessandro—-

What does your argument have to do with vegan entrees at restaurants?

Straw man.

Posted by Debz on 02/26 at 11:40 AM

One more thing, Alessandro: Guess who else went to Yale? Wayne Pacelle.

Posted by HumaneWatch on 02/26 at 12:56 PM

Mr Machi.. surely you jest.. Even ‘fast food” restaurants have some sort of salad.. Your boycott of Yale?? LOL. now that really is funny

Why do vegans want to eat thing named after meat..? Or are “buffalo wings’ named after the city? Why do they always say “tastes just like______”?  ( some sort of meat/fish/dairy) Don’t they have any flavors of their own?

Posted by bestuvall on 02/26 at 05:39 PM

Just remember…everytime you order a vegan menu item, there are starving rabbits somewhere that could’ve thrived on that bit of salad you called a meal.

For me…I’ll eat beef!

Posted by Ray Schafer on 02/26 at 11:25 PM

Please add to your list United Way, they send contributions to HSUS.

Posted by Dennis on 02/27 at 08:45 AM

Well, we’ve gotten a little off track. I want to know who we can get off that sponsor list at HSUS-next. 

Let’s keep up the pressure in letting these sponsors know that their money is not being well spent.  Anyone?

Petsmart seems to be a particularly bad fit to sponsor HSUS- since they are very much on record in support of rescuing pets. I am appalled to think that the $1 you can put on the tape when you check out might be going to HSUS-since I have done that regularly. No more.  I’m writing them a letter for starters.

Posted by Julie on 02/27 at 08:55 AM

I am a retired teacher and long time cattle rancher and in reading these entries…towards the end I started to chuckle…it is so absurd.  Since I graduated in 1969…I have been suspicious of large efforts of propaganda and HSUS reeks of it…is rotten with it.  They are dishonest and are playing on peoples sentiments.  I just wonder where the money trail really leads..just as the Nature Conservancy…follow the money trail and you will be shocked!!  We are pawns and common sense needs to be embraced.  Thanks so for the stimulation.

Posted by Heather Kingdon on 03/04 at 10:00 PM

Great Site. Was added to my bookmarks. Greetings From USA.

Posted by mivanhoxcss on 03/06 at 11:30 AM

Very Interesting Blog! Thank You.

Posted by Mike J. on 10/04 at 06:37 PM

You certainly deserve a round of applause.

Posted by Mike on 10/14 at 07:02 PM

I’ve been visiting your blog for a while now and I always find a gem in what you write.  Thanks so much!

Posted by Olive on 10/25 at 09:32 PM

Comments are moderated, and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Extremely lengthy comments and those that contain obscenities may be edited before they are posted.

Add a comment:

Name:

Email: (will not be displayed)

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

« Back to blog homepage