This PDF contains HSUS’s reply in the case of Daniel Reed Christensen et al. v. Rosie Quinn et al., a federal lawsuit filed in September 2010. The reply, filed October 15, contains HSUS’s defense against the claims made in Christensen’s complaint.
Christensen sued HSUS following a September 2009 raid on his property. A judge ruled in early 2010 that the search warrant used in the raid, which was executed largely by HSUS and two animal control officers, was wrongfully obtained. The judge also declared that the animal control officer requesting the warrant “intentionally misled the issuing court by omitting material information in her affidavits and supplemental testimony.”
HSUS is represented by the Sioux Falls, SD law firm of Davenport, Evans, Hurwitz & Smith, L.L.P.